The Delhi Capitals (DC) match against the Lucknow Super Giants (LSG) on Friday night witnessed a moment of high drama, not for a spectacular wicket or boundary, but for a confusing exchange between captain Rishabh Pant and the umpire over a review.
Wide Ball Review Ignites Captain’s Frustration
The incident unfolded in the fourth over of the LSG innings. Veteran Indian fast bowler Ishant Sharma delivered a loosener down the leg-side to Devdutt Padikkal. The on-field umpire promptly signalled a wide, prompting a review from the DC camp. Replays confirmed the decision, but instead of relief, Pant was seen engaged in a lengthy and animated discussion with the umpire.
Pant’s visible frustration left the commentators scrambling to understand his objection. Initially, the commentary box concluded that Pant might have accidentally called for a review. However, replays showed the wicketkeeper clearly making the DRS signal.
Unanswered Appeal for Snickometer?
As the confusion deepened, former Indian captain Sunil Gavaskar offered a possible explanation. He suggested that Pant’s gestures might have been directed towards the mid-off fielder, seeking advice on whether to take the review.
However, further insights emerged from former cricketers Pommie Mbangwa and Deep Dasgupta, who were also part of the commentary panel. They suggested that Pant’s annoyance stemmed from the lack of a Snickometer check to determine if there was an outside edge when the ball passed Padikkal’s bat. This explanation aligned with Pant’s gestures, where he appeared to mimic putting his gloves to his ears, possibly indicating he heard a sound from the bat.
Review Lost, But DC Strikes Back
Despite his frustration, DC ultimately lost the review. However, the drama did not affect their bowling performance. Khaleel Ahmed dismissed Padikkal for just 3 runs in the very next over. Later, spin wizard Kuldeep Yadav picked up two wickets in two successive deliveries, restricting LSG to 80/5 at the halfway mark.
The incident highlights the complexities and potential for confusion surrounding the Decision Review System (DRS) in cricket. While technology plays a crucial role in adjudicating decisions, clear communication between players, umpires, and commentators remains essential to avoid such misunderstandings. This incident serves as a reminder for fans and players alike to understand the nuances of DRS protocols and the limitations of technology in making conclusive calls.
Stay updated with all the cricketing action, follow Cricadium on WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter, Telegram and Instagram
