The debate over who is the superior batter between Virat Kohli and Babar Azam has often sparked discussions among cricket fans and experts alike. However, former Pakistan spinner Danish Kaneria believes that the comparison is unnecessary and sees Kohli as the clear superior between the two. Speaking in an interview with SportsTak, Kaneria expressed his frustration over the ongoing comparisons, emphasizing Kohli’s impressive track record and his commanding presence on the field, which he feels outshines that of Babar Azam. As Babar struggles with his form, Kaneria suggested that a final judgment on their legacies should be made only after both players have retired, based on their career statistics.
Virat Kohli’s Dominance: A Cut Above the Rest
The debate over who is the better batsman, Virat Kohli or Babar Azam, has been ongoing for years. However, former Pakistan spinner Danish Kaneria believes the answer is evident, pointing to Kohli’s superior record. Kaneria, in his interview with SportsTak, dismissed comparisons between the two, emphasizing Kohli’s prolific run-scoring abilities worldwide. “He has scored runs all around the world. He is a massive player,” Kaneria stated, highlighting Kohli’s consistency and success across different conditions and formats, making him an irreplaceable asset for Team India.
Kaneria also spoke about Kohli’s commanding presence on the field, which he believes sets him apart from his peers, including Babar Azam. Kohli’s aura and influence, Kaneria suggested, make a significant impact on the game, an attribute he finds lacking in Babar at this stage. For Kaneria, the media often manufactures comparisons between Kohli and Babar to generate hype, but a closer examination of their records will always favor the Indian batsman. He advised fans and analysts to look at the career stats of both players once they retire to understand Kohli’s true greatness.
The Media’s Role in Fueling Comparisons
Kaneria criticized the media’s role in fueling the Kohli vs. Babar debate, suggesting that such comparisons are created primarily to generate content and attract viewership. According to Kaneria, the continuous comparison between the two players is more about selling media products than evaluating cricketing skills. He expressed his frustration over being repeatedly asked to compare Kohli and Babar, insisting that he never saw a reason to pit them against each other. “All that is created by the channels to sell their product,” he commented, urging fans to recognize the difference between media narratives and actual on-field performances.
The former cricketer called for a more nuanced approach to appreciating cricketing talent, one that does not rely solely on head-to-head comparisons. He urged fans to consider the broader context of each player’s career, including the different challenges they face and their individual contributions to their respective teams. By focusing on these aspects rather than superficial comparisons, Kaneria believes the cricketing community can foster a deeper appreciation for both Kohli’s and Babar’s unique qualities and achievements.
Stay updated with all the cricketing action, follow Cricadium on WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter, Telegram and Instagram
